Skip to content

fix(api): stop reporting an expired refresh token as an error - #568

Merged
jplacht merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/drop-refresh-401-report
Oct 3, 2026
Merged

jplacht merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/drop-refresh-401-report

Conversation

@jplacht

@jplacht jplacht commented Oct 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What and why
An expired refresh token makes POST /user/refresh/ return 401, which ends the session as designed (axiosSetup.ts → refreshOrEndSession). apiService.reportError still sent it to PostHog error tracking as ApiClientError, so normal logouts showed up as errors (found by /error-review: 7 events / up to 7 users in 24 h, all expired sessions). The backend already logs the refresh 401.

Changes

  • src/lib/apiService.ts: ApiClientError is now only a 429; the refresh-401 clause and its comment are removed.
  • src/tests/lib/apiService.test.ts: the refresh-401 case now asserts nothing is tracked or reported.
  • docs/data-layer.md: updated the list of reported errors.

How it was verified
pnpm test (118 files, 3712 passed, 1 expected fail), pnpm tsc, pnpm lint, pnpm knip: all pass.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

- a 401 of POST /user/refresh/ is a normal logout, no longer sent to
  PostHog error tracking as ApiClientError; only 429 remains
- test asserts the refresh 401 is not tracked; docs/data-layer.md updated

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Deploy Preview for prunplanner-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 938be26
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/prunplanner-preview/deploys/6ac0afb6b0ca10000888cd4c
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-568--prunplanner-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@codacy-production

codacy-production Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 complexity · 0 duplication

Metric Results
Complexity 0
Duplication 0

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage 100.00% diff coverage · +0.00% coverage variation

Metric Results
Coverage variation ✅ +0.00% coverage variation (-1.00%)
Diff coverage ✅ 100.00% diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (cb0ee51) 3715 3628 97.66%
Head commit (938be26) 3715 (+0) 3628 (+0) 97.66% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#568) 1 1 100.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@jplacht
jplacht merged commit c165a93 into main Oct 3, 2026
11 checks passed
@jplacht
jplacht deleted the fix/drop-refresh-401-report branch October 3, 2026 08:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant